Transsexual Sexuality
Adriana Sommer da Costa
Psychologist and Sexologist
Under popular scrutiny someone wearing opposite sex's
clothes easily sticks out as cross-dresser.
In the sexuality field the term cross-dresser
suggests erotic/sexual pleasure derived from draping
with opposite sex's clothes. So, both men and women
fall under its patterns.
For the sake of information the term cross-dresser was first employed by the sex-therapist Magnus Hirschfeld
in 1910.
A cross-dresser goes out and about wearing women's
clothes or men's clothes. Its hard to tell whether it's women's
clothes or gay's clothes. Some would wear only underwear
of the opposite sex underneath their plain clothes.
Thus, away from public eye the cross-dresser might
derive sexual pleasure wearing intimate lingerie and a wide
range of accessories to go with.
Nonetheless, a cross-dresser shouldn't be compared
to a transsexual. This is so because the sexual orientation of an individual has no linkage with the term
cross-dresser. Such may occur with total disregard
of sexual orientation.
Lets reinforce here, there are those who in work hectic have
to dress up as the opposite sex without meaning a thing
on homosexuality flare. In this case, the term is transformist,
whose work commitment doesn't imply in sexual heightening
or sex drive. There might be possible to some individuals
to get a kick out of cross-dressing whether as a lesbian
or as a gay man. It's perfectly normal to get all pepped
up from wearing the opposite sex attires and accessories
mostly for men. Having said that, women's fashion offer enticingly
well-thought range of options contrary to men's. Its name
is travestic fetishism, taking so many to show-biz
stardom under the guise of drag-queen. The cross-dresser phenomena shifts from person to person, hinging on physical
attributes, the degree of mannerisms and even clothing optional
capability. Once outlandish looks are put on hold everything
returns to normal.
The cross-dresser, whether man or woman, usually concern
about castration; A Freud-like phase described on his sexuality
theory. Such a psychoanalytical interpretation may be perceived
as follows; The homosexual replaces his love for his
mother by identifying with her, the fetishist refuses to admit
that a woman is penniless. The male cross-dresser embraces
simultaneously a two-fold behavior.
He envisages a woman with penis so that can overcome castration
distress and therefore identify himself with a phallic woman.
A cross-dresser shows no interest in trading or acquiring
sexual characteristics of the opposite sex. Even
so, emotionally overburden from discomfort with innate genitals.
They search anxiously through sex fantasies what it
would be like as the opposite sex.
As a rule of the thumb, a cross-dresser is unlikely
to let his/her hair out showing preferences towards men or
women. Sexual orientation fails to let them loose.
A little bit on transsexual: the transgender
features innate secondary sexual characteristics but
feels and perceives oneself as the opposite sex. As
in a convict lesbian straight from Lesbos-diesel dyke,
inside a puny women's body who challenges men on spatial reasoning.
The transsexual bears great psychic suffering, since
feeling trapped inside a biological glitch as far as determination
of sexual characteristics goes. They rely on gender-reassignment
surgery in an attempt to make for the loss. Its diagnose
utters psychological and psychiatric procedures in order to
unveil concealed reasons.
A cross-dresser accepts innate genitals. Regardless
of hormonal treatment undergone or beauty make-believes with
all its silicone driven fads the real cross-dresser
won't deny genitals and reach orgasm to boot. In addition,
the transsexual cant' bear the sight of his/hers genitals
and won't put up with it any longer whichever sexual orientation.
|